This is one of two posts on this site, looking at the arguments for and against this year’s referendum, as described in the official booklet, which you can download from the Australian Electoral Commission here. The other post can be found here. These posts will analyse and criticise the arguments made by both the Yes and No sides.
We are also including a selection of links to fact checking sites, in case you’re looking for more detail than we’ve gone into here:
- How do the ‘yes’ and ‘no’ cases stack up? Constitutional law experts take a look (article at The Conversation).
- RMIT FactLab (assorted posts about specific claims).
- ABC FactCheck (assorted posts about specific claims).
- We gave the Voice to Parliament pamphlets to fact checkers. Here’s what they said (article at SBS News).
- Voice to Parliament referendum essays – annotated and factchecked: yes case and no case (at The Guardian).
Enough preamble. On with the analysis.
Continue reading